Menu
Log in

Member login
For first-time access, enter your email and click "Forgot password"


Post authors appear as "Anonymous member" and replies cannot be added unless you log in.

All Vecinos members are pre-registered with logins. Vecinos non-members may request access by emailing admin@vecinosakumalnorte.org and login credentials will be provided.

Action requested to include Scott Brown as candidate for Vice President

  • 08-Feb-2024 4:42 PM
    Message # 13312722

    A group of Vecinos members, including me, recently sent a message to the community. For completeness I include this on this 2024 Vecinos election forum.  A response on this forum is welcomed. 

    ———-

    Dear Neighbor:

    Our community needs your help to right a wrong.

    Vecinos Member and citizen of Mexico, Scott Brown, submitted his name as a candidate for Vice President of Vecinos but the Vecinos board decided unfairly (and behind closed doors) that he is not qualified to serve in this role.   

    Vecinos’ bylaws have long required the President and Vice President to be “full-time residents of Akumal” but the bylaws don’t say what “full-time resident” means. In the past, the Board has interpreted this provision flexibly, recognizing that the purpose of the requirement is to ensure these positions are held only by members who can be physically present in Akumal Norte on a daily basis throughout most of the year. This year, however, the Board has ruled that Scott Brown, who has lived most of his life in Akumal Norte, who owns two properties in Akumal Norte, and who works every day out of an office in Akumal, is not qualified to serve as VP because he sleeps just up the road in Puerto Aventuras. 

    To date, the board has made no public announcement about their ruling on Scott’s qualifications even though Vecinos Bylaws REQUIRE that acts like this be ratified by the general membership of Vecinos.  The quiet effort to erase Scott’s name as a candidate for Vice President is allowing former President, Dan Freeman, to come out of retirement and run for VP unopposed.

    Director of Elections, Jon Kantor, recommended changing the candidate bio that Scott submitted without sharing the revisions with him and listed Scott on 
    the election webpage as a candidate for an At Large seat on the board, not as a candidate for VP.  So Scott has drafted a new online bio that reinstates his bid to run for Vice President and insists that Mr. Kantor prepare a ballot that lists his name as a candidate for Vice President (per the same interpretation of the residency requirement that was applied during elections in 2022 and 2023.)  

     (specific action items omitted)

    There’s still time to right this wrong but we need as many Vecinos members as possible to communicate with the Board ASAP.   (
    Several board members are running for reelection and need to understand they are acting against the wishes of a majority of the members who elected them.


    Thank you for making your voice heard on the injustice being done in your name by your association! 

    Sincerely, 

    Jeannie Patrick 

    +1(614) 581-2240

    Owner, Playa Caribe #11

    Candidate for an At Large Seat

    Liane Perry 

    +1(603) 930-4135

    Owner, La Bahia #11

    Candidate for an At Large Seat

    Lisa Wilson 

    +1(202) 905-6103

    Owner, Casa Fortuna

    Candidate for Secretary of the Board

    Steve Hamilton 

    +1(303) 884-5961

    Owner, Playa Blanca #8

    Vecinos Member

    Ron Stern 

    +1(949) 678-9102

    Owner, Casa de los Sueños

    Vecinos Member


    Marieke Brown 

    +52(984) 105-8475

    Owner, Playa Blanca #10

    Vecinos Member

  • 08-Feb-2024 9:23 PM
    Reply # 13312862 on 13312722

    As a signatory on the letter above and a Candidate for Secretary of Vecinos, I am confident that interpreting our bylaws in full conformity with their intent will not only ensure that our neighbor, Scott, appears on the election ballot as a candidate for Vice President, it will also usher in a new era of growth and inclusiveness for our association.  There are many challenges facing our lovely but fragile community. And joining together to address them will be key to protecting this place we’ve all grown to love so much. 

    Last modified: 08-Feb-2024 9:57 PM | Anonymous member
  • 10-Feb-2024 3:18 PM
    Reply # 13313680 on 13312722

    Once again as the former Charter Committee Chair 2022-23 and Director of Elections 2023 (and the elections coordinator in 2022) I am writing solely to correct inaccuracies or overstatements.

    The letter was not sent “to the community” but rather to what I presume was subset of that group. Some members of the community (including me) did not receive it.

    The board did not “decide unfairly”. The disqualification of Scott’s candidacy as VP was made by the Director of Elections. The board voted confidence in the Director.

    The board in recent years has not been flexible in interpreting the term “fulltime resident of Akumal” for the President and Vice President. “Fulltime” was agreed is 6months less a day and resident of Akumal is a fact.

    Puerto Aventuras is not “just up the road” it is a part of the municipality of Solidaridad not part of Tulum municipality.

    The board could not make a public announcement about Scott’s disqualification since it was not their decision.

    The Bylaws require that the general meeting of members ratifies the acts of the board taken during the year. There is no requirement to ratify actions at the time they are taken.

    Scott told me that he was withdrawing his candidacy for VP, I do not know what he discussed with Jon Kantor

    The interpretation of the residency requirement in 2022-2023 is unchanged. In 2022 there was no nominating committee so as coordinator of the elections I requested that candidates provided the necessary information (RFC and residence).

    I do not believe that the statement “acting against the wishes of the majority of the members who elected them” is accurate. Only after the conclusion of this year’s general meeting can the truth of this statement be verified.



  • 10-Feb-2024 5:05 PM
    Reply # 13313692 on 13312722

    I am curious how the Director of Elections has the power to disqualify any application of a candidate for a Vecinos office. Article 12 is appended below. The closest I can get to a possible authority to disqualify is  "The Nominating Committee will review candidate applications and report to the members of the Association in accordance with the Election Policy Manual." 

    There is no Election Policy Manual and there was no report to members of a disqualification.

    Regardless, the "accepted" tax-related definition of full-time residence is only accepted by some who, apparently, have no authority to disqualify.

    Please see my post on "What is a full-time resident"  

    All these difficulties should be overcome in current time with understanding the intent of any bylaw requirements that will maintain a vital organization. In the longer run, these instances can strengthen and better define procedures and words used in  the bylaws.

    Article 12. Appointment of Director of Elections.

    The board may appoint a member of “VECINOS” who is not a candidate for election as Director of Elections.
    Once the Director of Elections has been appointed, he may appoint two other members of “VECINOS” who are not candidates for election to form part of the Nominating Committee.
    The Director is responsible for all actions preceding the election.
    The Director of Elections will also be the organizer of the calls and the election procedure in accordance with the rules established in the Election Policy Manual.
    The Nominating Committee will review candidate applications and report to the members of the Association in accordance with the Election Policy Manual.
    The Director of Elections will not solicit proxies and, whenever possible, will not agree to be appointed as a proxyholder to avoid the appearance of conflict.
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software